Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Greener School Lunches

This week we celebrate Earth Day.  One way to improve the environment in our community is to find ways to reduce our waste stream and recycle as much as we can.

Every day, the district's Child Nutrition Services department serves about 3,500 meals to students at our 13 school campuses.  Every meal is currently served on a styrofoam tray.  These trays are discarded at the end of the meal, meaning that over 600,000 trays are discarded at our schools over the course of the school year.  Unfortunately, these polystyrene trays are made from non-renewable materials.  Even worse, there is no cost-effective way to recycle styrofoam, so all these trays end up in the landfill.  Since they don't biodegrade, they can linger for centuries.

I am very excited that starting in the fall, the district will be transitioning to trays made from compostable material.  Special thanks go to the district's Child Nutrition Services Department, led by Mari Fujikawa, for finding a way to make this happen.  While the trays cost about 3 cents more than the current styrofoam trays, this is a worthwhile investment.  I am proud that our district continues to find ways to be a responsible steward to the environment.  The use of compostable material will also teach our students to make wise choices when it comes to the kinds of products they buy.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Education "Statement of Conscience"

During the economic downturn of the past decade (and really since the late 1970s), California has devalued our children, as evidenced by the tremendous cuts in per-pupil funding. California is now about 48th out of 50 states in how much money is spent on educating each K-12 student. The Santa Barbara County Board of Education adopted a "Statement of Conscience" calling attention to this travesty.

I feel that their statement is so strong that I decided to simply reproduce it here. I have not seen a better expression of the frustration felt by school districts up and down the state. We are trying to do our best to educate every child, but it gets harder and harder to do it with less and less.

Santa Barbara COE's Statement of Conscience
"We, the members of the Santa Barbara County Board of Education, feel it is our duty to speak out on behalf of the students and school districts within our jurisdiction. Our county superintendent recently wrote an article alluding to the Homeland Security motto, “If you see something, say something.” We see severe danger. We feel it is our responsibility to make the statements that follow.

"When Californians passed Proposition 98 in the year 1988 they did so in a climate where funding for public education was being severely decreased. In recognition of the intrinsic, essential value of public schooling, the proposition required that funding for public education be preserved as a set percentage of the state’s expenditures. The intent was that school funding would never fall below the floor of funding that Proposition 98 guaranteed. Instead, Proposition 98 calculations became a funding ceiling above which support would never rise.

"There is every indication Proposition 98 would pass again were it placed on the ballot today, given the continued overwhelming support for public schooling. Californians are clear-sighted in their understanding of the urgency to educate children, for both the short-term needs and the long-range health and sustenance of our communities.

"Even before our nation was formed, the colonies and settlements acted on the premise that it was the responsibility of every adult in a community to contribute to resources to educate every child. Even small villages with few services or amenities nonetheless had schoolhouses. The concept of free and universal public education is the core of what makes our country exceptional, and continues to be the envy of the world.

"In public schools, children of every background, ethnicity, religious tradition, physical or mental ability, or socioeconomic status sit side by side and succeed based on individual effort. It is a true meritocracy. In classrooms throughout our state and nation, children learn the skills essential to their contributions to the democratic society they will enter as adults. Young people today will fly the planes, repair the cars, staff the emergency rooms, and make the policies that affect the generation that follows. Their preparation and education are what will make the difference between our success or failure as a society. This is simple fact.

"In most states, public education is a local responsibility, covered by local property taxes. California’s Proposition 13 severely curtailed the ability of local governments to continue to support local schools, and; the responsibility for funding public schooling was therefore absorbed by the state, adding to all its other vital responsibilities.

"We are well aware that our state faces a true fiscal crisis that was years in the making and is staggering in its magnitude. There are no easy solutions. Programs will need to be cut. Revenues will need to be added. As elected officials in our own sphere, we are mindful that representatives at every level need to make extremely difficult choices at every turn, and that the choices available in terms of the state budget will be wrenching. Every program currently receiving state funds has fervent supporters who can argue persuasively that those programs are vital and deserve continued support. We respectfully submit that not all institutions are equal. Public education is of a different magnitude and impact.

"We submit that it is unacceptable and self-defeating for the state to abdicate its responsibility to fund public schools at an adequate level. All that is important to our state’s health and vitality depends upon the satisfactory educational preparation of every child who lives or works here. Studies are unambiguous on how strongly a lack of education correlates with crime, poverty, the need for social services, incarcerations, law enforcement and a whole host of costly interventions. That is the practical need. There is also the moral need for societies to take care of their children.

"For decades California had a truly exceptional historical record of providing outstanding educational services from kindergarten through graduate and professional education. We believe it is a moral imperative that those individuals who reaped the rewards from the state’s earlier investment in education do all they can to ensure that comparable educational opportunities are available to young people today. The investment gap and consequent denial of educational opportunities are unconscionable.

"We do not presume to tell our legislators how they will work the state’s budget to secure the funding necessary to ensure our children receive the education they need and deserve; the logistics of how to go about that task is theirs to decide.

"We are stating emphatically, however, that there is urgent need to do so. The current situation is unsustainable. Education is not a frill; pared down levels of educational services are not an option. The very fabric of our society is at stake. We cannot lose a generation of young people simply because the adults refused to act."

Monday, March 12, 2012

The Berryessa Ed Foundation: Making a Difference

The Berryessa Education Foundation is an important part of the Berryessa community. Every year, they raise tens of thousands of dollars for the 13 schools in our district. Teachers can apply for grants to fund projects or buy supplies for their classrooms.

The biggest fundraiser of the year for the Berryessa Education Foundation is the "Raffle to Make a Difference." Last year, the foundation raised over $20,000 from the raffle. Tickets cost $4 each and can be purchased at any district school. For each ticket bought, half the money goes directly to the school where the ticket was sold, and the other half goes to the foundation.

There are all kinds of great prizes, from electronics like TVs, tablets, and an Xbox, to services and entertainment tickets. A complete prize list can be found here.

The drawing will take place on Saturday, March 24, at 11:00, at the district office. You don't have to be present to win. Stop by your local school today to buy tickets.

Friday, March 2, 2012

District Budget Update - No Pink Slips in 2012

March is here and with it is the statutory deadline to decide on whether or not to issue layoff notices to school teachers and certificated staff. Every year since I have been on the Board of Trustees, our district has issued "pink slips" in order to retain flexibility as we undertake the budget development process. Last year, Berryessa School District gave out 99 pink slips. As the budget came into better focus, we were able to reinstate almost everyone on the list and avoid more severe cuts. In addition, we set aside about $250 per student in reserve in case mid-year cuts materialized during the 2011-2012 school year.

The good news is that mid-year cuts were avoided, meaning that we can roll over the reserve to next year's budget. The bad news is that the coming year's budget is even more uncertain than in the past. Despite the high degree of uncertainty and since we have the ability to cover next year's budget in the case of cuts, I am very pleased that we will, for the first time in a number of years, proceed without any layoffs this year.

This is a very risky course of action, but one that is the right thing to do, both for our employees and in order to maintain a reasonable level of service for our students. We are operating under the assumption that all of our operations, including class size, school year length, and service hours, will remain unchanged from this year to next. There will be savings due to a large number of retiring teachers at the end of this school year.

A lot of our funding stability depends on two things happening. One is that some kind of tax measure passes in the state so that education funding can remain at its current level. Secondly, we must renew our local parcel tax so that our annual income stream of $1.7 million doesn't go away. Even with those two things, the budget we are preparing is in trouble for the second year out (2013-2014). As a result, the district will be forced to submit a "qualified budget" in our second interim report.

So while I am happy that the coming school year looks like it will be status quo as far as services for our students, we must continue to remain on top of our budget and save money in every way possible. And we will continue to hope that an improving economy means that the state will once again begin investing adequately in California students.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

2012-2013 State Budget Update

I have been too busy to write a detailed analysis of the Governor's proposed budget, released in January. The upshot is that there are lots of unknowns as we head into the 2012-2013 budget year. Governor Brown is tying the budget for schools to an initiative with tax increases that will appear on the November 2012 ballot.

If the tax measures pass, school budgets will increase, although the increase will be primarily used to end some of the deferrals that delay when school districts receive money from the state. So the results would be mainly status quo for school districts. If the tax measures fail, the Governor is proposing major cuts next year, more than 5%. As we plan for next year, we don't know what the outcome will be. So it leaves lots of unknowns in place.

After next week's Board Meeting, I will write more about where the Berryessa School District stands and how we are hoping to craft our budget for the coming year. For now, there is a good article written by another David Cohen, a school teacher from Palo Alto. Every year, State Senator Joe Simitian holds an education update. This year, the focus was on the Governor's budget proposal. Read the summary of the hearing here:

http://accomplishedcaliforniateachers.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/california-education-update/

Monday, January 9, 2012

How Do We Improve Public Education in America?

These days, much of my focus has been on the gross under-funding of public schools, particularly in California. I believe that our funding decisions reflect our values as a society, and the steep reduction in funding of schools means that we don't understand how important quality education is to the future of our state and country.

Besides funding, there are also real questions about the way to structure our schools in order to offer equal opportunity to all students, regardless of background.

There is a large amount of evidence that student performance correlates with poverty rates no matter the educational model used. Here is a provocative interview with Professor Michael Marder at the University of Texas in which he presents data showing the strong correlation. While many people are pushing charter schools as a panacea, Professor Marder's data also shows that charter schools clearly lag public schools in performance. We must be very careful in how we expand the charter school movement in order to make sure it really does benefit all students, both at the charters and the traditional public schools.

Ten years ago, Congress created "No Child Left Behind," which puts a great emphasis on testing in order to gauge student progress and created an expectation that all students will be proficient by 2013. While the goal is admirable, additional tools or strategies were not offered along with the evaluation components.

We can learn a lot from schools in Finland, which are widely recognized as the best performing schools in the world. In Finland, there are no standardized tests. Students are evaluated by their teachers and the National Ministry of Education tracks progress by periodically testing a random sample of students. The key is that Finland's model for education relies on "the idea that every child should have exactly the same opportunity to learn, regardless of family background, income, or geographic location. Education has been seen first and foremost not as a way to produce star performers, but as an instrument to even out social inequality... This starts with the basics. Finland offers all pupils free school meals, easy access to health care, psychological counseling, and individualized student guidance." In other words, school is about more than curriculum. It is about making sure that all students are provided with everything they need to be successful. By the way, there are no private schools in Finland. The public schools are given all the resources they need to educate everyone. [Read more about Finish schools.]

Until we make education a priority and are willing to learn from the data and from education models that are working, we are shortchanging many of our next generation. Let's resolve in 2012 to work together to find ways to address the underlying needs of our students. It can be done through public schools, without relying on private institutions or charter schools.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

School Budget Spared - for now

Today, Governor Brown announced the trigger cuts for the middle of the 2011-2012 fiscal year. Things aren't as bad for K-12 schools as feared. The Governor has declared that the economy is improving, and as a result, just $1 billion in cuts will be triggered. While higher education and child care took significant cuts, K-12 schools will be spared. There are some cuts to transportation funding, which amounts to about $11 per student.

As you may remember, this year's state budget included an assumption of $4 billion in additional revenue. If the money didn't materialize, automatic cuts would be triggered on January 1. Today's projection from the Department of Finance shows a shortfall, but less of one than many expected. Schools faced as much as $250 per student in mid-year cuts. Our district set aside the money in reserve to cover the potential cuts for the remainder of this year. We can now use that money to make up for some of our ongoing structural deficit over the next few years.

However, we are not out of the woods yet. Recent estimates are that California faces another $7 billion deficit for 2012-2013. So once again, the legislature will be contemplating cuts when discussing the next budget. That is, unless revenues can be raised in the November 2012 election.

In the mean time, we can enjoy a happier holiday season, knowing that things could have been much worse. Let's hope that the economy continues to improve and California can begin to reinvest in our children.